Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fitsinto: rework fitsinto to actually do subtyping #48

Merged

Conversation

LunNova
Copy link
Contributor

@LunNova LunNova commented Dec 7, 2023

This is still broken for value.tuple_type but is an improvement over the completely wrong approach in my earlier commit which allowed values that aren't types.

May require yet another different approach to properly handle tuple types, not yet known.

@LunNova LunNova force-pushed the lunnova/fitsinto-testcases branch from 9d58277 to 19a0da8 Compare December 7, 2023 21:33
@LunNova LunNova changed the title test-fitsinto: init with some test cases fitsinto: rework fitsinto to actually do subtyping Dec 8, 2023
@LunNova LunNova marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2023 03:20
@LunNova LunNova force-pushed the lunnova/fitsinto-testcases branch from 194cccb to 2b618a2 Compare December 9, 2023 01:21
@LunNova LunNova force-pushed the lunnova/fitsinto-testcases branch from 2b618a2 to f128a3b Compare December 9, 2023 01:22
@LunNova LunNova requested a review from aiverson December 9, 2023 01:25
@aiverson aiverson merged commit d1f6d81 into Fundament-Software:main Dec 9, 2023
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants